Post pics of sick cars

September 13, 2010 @ 01:47:51 AM
Post: 6020
Join Date: Feb 2009
is that beckham in the rolls? son of a bitch

Melo Gang All Day

September 13, 2010 @ 20:56:33 PM
Post: 1862
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: toe ron toe
Naw bruh rotarys are frail as fuck,and aren't even on the same planet as RB's and the 2jz,hell a B18 can take more boost than any wanker motor.


dat ignorant fanboy statement. Any experience with a rotary?

^Your obviously a Mazda fanboy, Mike Whiddets car only makes around 450 hp with the quad rotor set up and it's nowhere near streetable, and you obviously don't know how much time,money,and custom fab work is required to make that much NA power from a quad rotor,put that same amount of money and time into a RB or 2jz and you'll be pushing 700hp at the wheels no questions asked. Import engines are not great at NA power, that's a fact. Come back when you actually know something about cars.

http://speedhunters.com/archive/2008/06/05/car-feature-gt-gt-mad-mike-s-rx7.aspx


For starters, the article linked is a 20B powered FD. I doubt the goal behind it was streetability, regardless of that fact I know of a couple street driven 20b's in the area, and one 4rotor.

The 4rotor Madbul made 500 and has an insane torque curve. I'd like to see one as flat and peaks (&holds) as early as that. The goal of a 4rotor setup in motorsports (specifically in Mike's car) isn't, for the most part, about max power. It's more about usable power.

I'm not going to bother addressing the money issue. The same can be said for any engine configuration. There's always going to be a cheaper alternative to the same amount of power. There's too many variables to account for to label one engine better than the next.

To end off, I'd still say the 26B sounds better than 99% of the engines out there.
September 14, 2010 @ 00:39:15 AM
Post: 691
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 604
September 14, 2010 @ 06:53:21 AM
Post: 577
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: $D, CA
is that beckham in the rolls? son of a bitch


Definitely is. SWAG.
*insertsomesouljaboygifhere
September 14, 2010 @ 12:40:49 PM
Post: 868
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LA
i like ur style modernmischief

besides the red lip on the a4 :}
September 14, 2010 @ 21:20:35 PM
Post: 749
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: bklyn
this shop near my job workin on a batmobile lol

September 16, 2010 @ 16:17:59 PM
Post: 3866
Join Date: Mar 2009


dope gs inspired prelude
September 16, 2010 @ 21:28:19 PM
Post: 876
Join Date: Feb 2010
lol, haha.
September 16, 2010 @ 22:28:25 PM
Post: 2411
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Richmond,VA
Absolutely beautiful
September 17, 2010 @ 00:17:31 AM
Post: 757
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: seattle
nah

Easy mang...

September 17, 2010 @ 00:30:42 AM
Post: 645
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: America's finest city
IDK if this car has been posted before because I wasn't about to read through 140 pages. The Zenvo ST1:


Too bad Zenvo is only making 15 of these and they would go for like $1.3 million anyway. But they look cool and have almost as much power as a Bugatti Veyron.
September 17, 2010 @ 00:42:40 AM
Post: 4375
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: nyc
it looks and is shaped a lot like the audi r8. im guessing they're using the r8's chassis?
September 17, 2010 @ 01:34:43 AM
Post: 2411
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Richmond,VA
dat ignorant fanboy statement. Any experience with a rotary?

For starters, the article linked is a 20B powered FD. I doubt the goal behind it was streetability, regardless of that fact I know of a couple street driven 20b's in the area, and one 4rotor.

The 4rotor Madbul made 500 and has an insane torque curve. I'd like to see one as flat and peaks (&holds) as early as that. The goal of a 4rotor setup in motorsports (specifically in Mike's car) isn't, for the most part, about max power. It's more about usable power.

I'm not going to bother addressing the money issue. The same can be said for any engine configuration. There's always going to be a cheaper alternative to the same amount of power. There's too many variables to account for to label one engine better than the next.

To end off, I'd still say the 26B sounds better than 99% of the engines out there.


Everything you just said is irrelevant,but back to my original statement,if you put the same amount of money into a 26b and a RB26,the rb will easily make more horsepower consistently,and rotarys are nowhere near as durable as the inline 6's,but if you want to continue argueing that's fine.
September 23, 2010 @ 17:49:51 PM
Post: 757
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: seattle

Easy mang...

September 24, 2010 @ 18:42:41 PM
Post: 1862
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: toe ron toe
Everything you just said is irrelevant,but back to my original statement,if you put the same amount of money into a 26b and a RB26,the rb will easily make more horsepower consistently,and rotarys are nowhere near as durable as the inline 6's,but if you want to continue argueing that's fine.


Yeap, cast iron blocks will get ya.

I was merely rebutting the ignorant stance you took in your original statement.

My opinion is, if the same amount of money and time were spent developing the rotary as was put into the more traditional flavour it'd be a more level playing field.
September 25, 2010 @ 18:09:35 PM
Post: 867
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CT bitch


blacked out ranges are the sickest fucking cars and that cls u posted is sex also
September 25, 2010 @ 20:55:33 PM
Post: 502
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
just a few i've been feelin' lately




September 26, 2010 @ 21:04:08 PM
Post: 1633
Join Date: Jan 2007



smokeyfacesmokeyface

(Invalid img)

my goodnesssss
September 27, 2010 @ 23:15:52 PM
Post: 1286
Join Date: Sep 2009
September 28, 2010 @ 00:35:37 AM
Post: 2411
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Richmond,VA

September 28, 2010 @ 08:33:49 AM
Post: 2
Join Date: Jan 2008
That's a real hypebeasta..............3.5L V8 TT, rear mount



September 28, 2010 @ 14:33:26 PM
Post: 1862
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: toe ron toe
You ruined the tailights. But do you.
September 29, 2010 @ 03:50:03 AM
Post: 502
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA



the wheels on the first BMW are horrible...

but i do like the second pic, that 6 series is clean as fuck
October 09, 2010 @ 18:46:52 PM
Post: 3918
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
^
that second beamer is sick and i think the blacked out taillights look fine
October 09, 2010 @ 20:09:29 PM
October 09, 2010 @ 23:23:25 PM
Post: 269
Join Date: Sep 2010
Originally posted by Inactive User
*images*


Love the purple volks, but isn't having that window down increasing drag?
October 12, 2010 @ 16:14:24 PM
Post: 2529
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFxAZ
Love the purple volks, but isn't having that window down increasing drag?


they have to be down when you autocross/ race. in case they need to reach in and open the the door.
October 13, 2010 @ 01:20:45 AM
Post: 3866
Join Date: Mar 2009





so dope. what do you guys prefer? 2.0T or 3.8?
October 13, 2010 @ 13:01:01 PM
Post: 1862
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: toe ron toe
3.8 stock, but the 4banger gawts potential. EVO X block.
October 13, 2010 @ 19:53:22 PM
Post: 1286
Join Date: Sep 2009
(Invalid img)
Please login first to reply.
x