Im starting a cheap denim brand

September 04, 2010 @ 00:56:18 AM
Post: 24
Join Date: Aug 2009
use a measuring tape and measure the sizes in cm? that definitely cant go wrong. you got the pics already?
September 04, 2010 @ 01:08:08 AM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
pictures added!
September 04, 2010 @ 01:59:06 AM
Post: 439
Join Date: Aug 2009
Better than i thought...thats all i can say
September 04, 2010 @ 12:35:52 PM
Post: 1256
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: LA County
hmm looks decent
September 04, 2010 @ 13:18:01 PM
Post: 4107
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NNNNJJJJJ
i WAS interested til i realized a 30 wouldnt go up to my thighs smh
September 04, 2010 @ 13:20:54 PM
Post: 4073
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Illinois
Not feelin' it.

When you make 34's, hopefully you'll make a straight cut.
September 04, 2010 @ 13:27:29 PM
Post: 105
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
The checkered pair looks really bad, and the cut looks weird aswell. The back selvedge pair look tight as hell too!
September 04, 2010 @ 14:09:30 PM
Post: 737
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
i like em both. if i could get measurements for the 2nd pair thatd be awesome.
September 04, 2010 @ 14:57:40 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
not sure what u meant by back selvedge pair, but these pictures don't really do justice, it really ain't that bad like, its not as tight as you would think, unless ur not the right size...
September 04, 2010 @ 14:59:54 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
like same with cheap mondays...my cheap monday pair looks quite similar to the second one, it starts out tight but it turns out fitting well at the end
September 04, 2010 @ 15:02:35 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
and to goldeni, the first pair im pretty sure is a straight cut, its just that the fit pics were taken to have it look kinda tight
September 04, 2010 @ 15:05:27 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
tbh I don't like the checkered design tongueface
September 04, 2010 @ 15:08:21 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
well u wouldnt really see it when its worn because its the INSIDE, if u look closely u will see that the pant legs are rolled up
September 04, 2010 @ 15:22:58 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
back pockets also look a bit awkward
September 04, 2010 @ 15:28:30 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
yeah it may seem a bit awkward, but it was made that way for that low rise effect... but its only a tad lower, not so low that it would be behind your thighs
September 04, 2010 @ 15:33:10 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
blushingWell it's a work in progress so I'm sure it will turn out good
September 04, 2010 @ 15:34:24 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
yeah, im really hoping so :/
September 04, 2010 @ 15:39:15 PM
Post: 3856
Join Date: Jan 2009
first ones, not so much.....

the 2nd ones look like they could have some potential man, i would advise a few tweaks
September 04, 2010 @ 15:39:52 PM
Post: 200
Join Date: Oct 2006
inside patchwork is extremely ugly, dunno why you went with that. sometimes people have to cuff the jeans....

extremely awkward fitting and backpockets. from what i read these are chinese made?? dunno about that quality homie.

i eat boxes

September 04, 2010 @ 15:47:50 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
Originally posted by Inactive User
first ones, not so much.....

the 2nd ones look like they could have some potential man, i would advise a few tweaks


Yea I agree the second ones look a bit to skinny if you made it a bit wider than they would be &)&)&)
September 04, 2010 @ 15:48:05 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
thx for the feedback, ill really consider taking out the checkered inside for the next few pairs, and as for the quality, it really isnt that bad, a few of my buddies tried it on and they thought it was pretty good for china made quality.... i will most likely post up the measurements tonite..
September 04, 2010 @ 15:49:01 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
Yea I agree the second ones look a bit to skinny if you made it a bit wider than they would be &)&)&)


they will loosen up, :D the pics were taken when the guys wore it brand new
September 04, 2010 @ 15:53:11 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
they will loosen up, :D the pics were taken when the guys wore it brand new


True I guess we really wouldn't know until someone wore them for a while
September 04, 2010 @ 15:56:55 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
wait where are the pics??? ?)?)?) dont see any


Page 1 brah
September 04, 2010 @ 16:11:06 PM
Post: 105
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
not sure what u meant by back selvedge pair, but these pictures don't really do justice, it really ain't that bad like, its not as tight as you would think, unless ur not the right size...


Sorry, meant the black pair. Although they seem to be just really dark indigo at a second look.

Would be nice if you could get some close up pics to show the quality/selvedge.
September 04, 2010 @ 16:24:23 PM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
close up pics added
September 04, 2010 @ 16:25:35 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
close up pics added


Looks ok not THAT great
September 04, 2010 @ 21:40:54 PM
Post: 749
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Area
wers the cotton grown

Not with a bang but a whimper

September 04, 2010 @ 22:57:40 PM
Post: 159
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WoofWoof
thnx breh

and as for the pants, well.... :|

why checkered? and are you making a cut that is not so slim, oh and do you have inseam measurements plus pics of the selvedge inside the pants

kbaithnx


Agreed. smokeyface
September 05, 2010 @ 02:13:38 AM
Post: 151
Join Date: Sep 2009
the cuts arent that slim, pics were taken when they were tried on brand new
Please login first to reply.
x