Puma Clyde VS Converse Chuck Taylor

December 23, 2006 @ 02:29:37 AM
Post: 19
Join Date: Dec 2006
which would you rather cop:

Puma Clyde or Converse Chuck Taylor?
December 23, 2006 @ 02:34:27 AM

Inactive User

Dependent on colourway, but most likely Puma Clydes. They're more durable, so if longevity is a priority, go with Clydes.
December 23, 2006 @ 10:34:56 AM
Post: 272
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Midwest
Chucks are like 15 bucks, so I'll buy 3 pairs of those and then get a pair of Clydes to wear out cause they're much nicer looking.
December 23, 2006 @ 11:33:14 AM
Post: 783
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Chuck Taylor's just seem like the journey men's shoe in the sense that they go with everyything. They may not look the best but they seem to get the job done but i can't really picture Clydes looking bad unless they are some skinny ass pants
December 30, 2006 @ 16:50:33 PM
Post: 453
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland, the burbs...
im a puma guy but recently ive been trynna lean my style towars a more simple look, so i'd chose chucks plus my nickname is chuk, not clyde lol
December 30, 2006 @ 17:20:36 PM
Post: 177
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 604
both are gd but for me i'm going for clydes now, got too many chucks already
December 31, 2006 @ 16:13:14 PM
Post: 1862
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: toe ron toe
Clydes. Chucks haven't done me wrong..but there's just something odd when they're on my feet.
December 31, 2006 @ 17:30:36 PM
Post: 1356
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston/Philly
chucks are ugly clydes are not
December 31, 2006 @ 21:22:26 PM
Post: 1503
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 510
clydes all the way
December 31, 2006 @ 23:13:48 PM
Post: 75
Join Date: Jul 2006
going to get a pair soon...smokeyface
January 01, 2007 @ 21:57:05 PM
Post: 1425
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Clydes, no doubt.
Please login first to reply.